Board Member Profile: Nancy Barendse

Nancy-BarendseNancy Barendse

 

Education

PhD., University of South Carolina

M.A., Clemson University

B.A., Auburn University

 

Dr. Nancy Barendse currently serves as Treasurer for CarolinasWPA. She is a Professor of English at Charleston Southern University. Nancy’s goal for CarolinasWPA is that the organization will continue to involve members such as herself, who teach at small schools that either lack or have underdeveloped writing programs within the English Department.

 

“I have found it invaluable to be able to talk with and learn from people who speak my language, people who share my view on writing,” says Nancy of CarolinasWPA.

 

Nancy’s research interests include digital and multi-modal rhetoric. She is also involved with the National Council of Teachers of English, Assembly for Literature for Adolescents, and Council of Writing Program Administrators. Nancy has had articles and reviews appear in the Journal of Teaching Writing, The SECOL Review and the Concise Dictionary of Literary Biography.

 

Board Member Profile: Rachel Spear

Rachel-SpearRachel Spear

 

Education

Ph.D., Louisiana State University

Ed.S., Louisiana State University

M.A., Louisiana State University

B.A., Millsaps College

 

Dr. Rachel N. Spear serves as an At-Large CarolinasWPA board member in South Carolina. Rachel describes CarolinasWPA as the “ideal organization for collaboration, connection, and community.” Her goal as one of the South Carolina representatives is to increase the presence and participation of SC writing faculty and administrators in the organization. She also wishes to strengthen the ease of communicating and working with others with like interests.

 

Rachel’s research interests include writing pedagogy and writing studies, with a focus that relies on interdisciplinary studies to investigate women’s life-writing post-trauma and the transformative benefit of writing one’s story. Her recent publications and conference presentations include “Let Me Tell You a Story’: On Teaching Trauma Narratives, Writing, and Healing” in Pedagogy; “Can’t We JUST Write!?: The Risks and Rewards of Using Mindfulness and Expressive Writing in Revision Workshops” at CCCC; and “Changing Rape Culture through Curriculum and Collaboration” at NeMLA.

 

In addition to her research and work with CarolinasWPA, Rachel is an Associate Professor of English and Coordinator of the Composition Program at Francis Marion University. She also serves as the Women’s and Gender Studies Caucus Board Representative for the Northeast Modern Language Association.

Board Member Profile: Collie Fulford

collie-fulford

Collie Fulford

 

Education

Ph.D., 2009, University of Massachusetts – Amherst

M.A., 2005, University of Massachusetts – Amherst

B.A., 2002, Keene State College

 

Collie Fulford is the President-Elect for CarolinasWPA.  She is an Assistant Professor of English composition and rhetoric in the Department of Language and Literature at North Carolina Central University where she directs First-Year Writing and chairs the writing concentration committee.

 

Collie is interested in increasing minority engagement in CarolinasWPA and diversifying the institutions that are involved in the organization. She feels that writing programs operate in highly complex organizations and are thus often sites of crisis and conflict. Collie believes this situational reality also means, however, that they can be sites of great creativity and collaboration.

 

“CarolinasWPA provides occasions for members to broach the most challenging aspects of teaching and program administration while tapping into our collective creativity, humor, and wisdom,” says Collie.

 

Her current research addresses minority education and writing program development. She also studies the rhetoric of higher education.  Her recent articles in IJSoTL, WPA, and Composition Studies pertain to writing program administration issues.

 

Board Member Profile: Chris Warnick

chris-warnickChris Warnick

Education

Ph.D., 2006, English, with a concentration in Composition, Literacy, Pedagogy, and Rhetoric, University of Pittsburgh

M.A., 1999, English, University of Pittsburgh

B.A., 1991, English, Ohio State University

 

Dr. Chris Warnick currently serves on the CarolinasWPA board as an At-Large South Carolina Representative. Chris’s goal for the organization is to actively uphold the legacy of mentorship and support established by previous CarolinasWPA members. His personal objective within the group is to introduce and engage more of his colleagues in South Carolina.

 

In addition to his work with CarolinasWPA, Chris serves as an Associate Professor of English and First-Year Writing Coordinator at the College of Charleston. He is also the Submissions Editor of the journal Literacy in Composition Studies.

 

Chris’s research interests largely involve student academic literacy. He has collaborated with other members of CarolinasWPA to analyze the writing and revision practices of undergraduate mathematics students. He is currently conducting a longitudinal study that analyzes how the College of Charleston’s First-Year Experience program impacts students’ general education coursework, their work in their majors, and their extracurricular experiences.

 

 

 

Board Member Profile: Paula Patch

Paula PatchPaula Patch

 

B.A., 1997, University of North Carolina at Greensboro

M.A., 2000, Eastern New Mexico University

 

Paula Patch currently serves as one of the At-Large North Carolina board members for CarolinasWPA, an organization that she describes as a family. It is her goal not only to foster this type of academic environment within CarolinasWPA, but also to provide the structure and leadership that will further this outcome. On a larger scale, Patch’s vision for the organization includes bringing in outside colleagues to the group’s conferences – such as Wildacres and Meeting in the Middle – to spread CWPA’s message. To Paula, this means that board members must be agents for change in the discipline and in their local situations. Specifically, Paula aspires for the organization to increase the number of members who represent community colleges, smaller universities, and HBCUs.

 

“In a word, advocacy is the vision and goal,” says Paula.

 

In addition to serving on the CarolinasWPA board, Paula is a Senior Lecturer in English at Elon University, where she coordinates the first-year writing program. In this role, Paula focuses on information literacy, particularly looking at how strong library-writing program partnerships can affect first-year students’ information literacy behaviors and attitudes. She also studies the role of non-tenure track faculty in academic departments and programs. Paula is interested in two specific questions: What are the experiences, situations, and perceptions of permanent non-tenure track faculty? And, how do permanent non-tenure faculty lines trouble the idea of tiered or tracked faculty positions?

 

Paula is currently working with a colleague on an internal grant-funded project to revamp the grammar proficiency test and preparation for students matriculating into Elon’s School of Education. She also conducts local research on a non-credit writing enrichment seminar for high school juniors in Alamance County.

Board Member Profile: Patrick Bahls

Patrick BahlsPatrick Bahls

 

Education

B.S., 1998, University of Denver

M.S., 2000, Vanderbilt University

Ph.D., 2002, Vanderbilt University

 

 

Dr. Patrick Bahls currently serves as Secretary for CarolinasWPA. It is Patrick’s goal to spread the organization’s involvement, actively engaging the faculty and staff of more institutions, particularly those at two-year colleges. He envisions CarolinasWPA collaborating more with leaders of writing programs with WAC/WID components that involve faculty from across the disciplines in leadership roles.

 

Patrick’s research interests are how composition and rhetoric focus on writing in the disciplines (with emphasis on STEM disciplines), writing across the curriculum, writing to learn, and writing program development.

 

In addition to his involvement with CarolinasWPA, Patrick is an Associate Professor of Mathematics and the Honors Program Director at the University of North Carolina – Asheville. Patrick ‘s book, Student Writing in the Quantitative Disciplines: A Guide for College Faculty, offers a pedagogy of writing within mathematics disciplines.

Call for Nominations: Executive Board At-Large Members

The Executive Board invites nominations for two positions: At-Large South Carolina Representative and At-Large North Carolina Representative.

 

The Carolinas WPA serves as an affiliate of the Council of Writing Program Administrators. All Executive Board members should be members of the Council of Writing Program Administrators (or be willing to obtain such membership upon election to the board).

 

Nomination Process

To nominate someone or yourself, please review the open positions below. You may nominate someone with their permission for any of the positions listed below. You may, of course, nominate yourself for one of the available positions. Please note that those nominated will be asked to submit a brief biographical statement before being included on the ballot. Those newly elected are expected to attend our “Meeting in the Middle” (the meeting we have each February at UNC Charlotte).

 

Please send an email indicating clearly the person’s name, status at their institution (Assistant Professor, Doctoral Student, etc.), their affiliation, and the position for which you are nominating. The nominating person should include a very brief paragraph as to why this person might be a good fit for the board/position and for the organization.

 

Once the deadline for nominations has expired, the board will develop a ballot to be sent via the CarolinasWPA Listserv where all who are subscribed to the CarolinasWPA list will have an opportunity to vote on the candidates nominated for each position. Once the voting has ended and the votes have been verified, the Executive Board will announce the new board members and their respective positions.

 

Please send all nominations to Tracy Ann Morse (morset@ecu.edu) no later than Monday, November 30, 2015.

 

* Online voting ballots will be available approximately December 7 with voting ending on December 18.

 

Open Positions

1) At-Large Position: South Carolina Representative

 

This person will serve a term of two years in this role: January 1, 2016–January 1, 2018.

 

At-Large positions on the board serve multiple purposes. One is to ensure representation from both states (NC/SC). Another is to conduct out-reach within the representative state to recruit other members from NC/SC and community colleges. At-Large positions help to organize both the Meeting in the Middle and the Annual Fall Retreat. At-Large positions are directly responsible for managing or otherwise putting together panels for conferences like SAMLA, TYCA, NCETA and/or NCEI. They may contribute in other ways as initiatives arise.

 

2) At-Large Position: North Carolina Representative

 

This person will serve a term of two years in this role: January 1, 2016–January 1, 2018.

 

At-Large positions on the board serve multiple purposes. One is to ensure representation from both states (NC/SC). Another is to conduct out-reach within the representative state to recruit other members from NC/SC and community colleges. At-Large positions help to organize both the Meeting in the Middle and the Annual Fall Retreat. At-Large positions are responsible for managing or otherwise putting together panels for conferences like SAMLA, TYCA, NCETA and/or NCEI. They may contribute in other ways as initiatives arise.

 

Board Member Profile: Anthony Atkins

Tony AtkinsAnthony Atkins

Education

Ph.D., Ball State University
M.A., East Carolina University
B.A., East Carolina University

 

 

As immediate past-president, Dr. Tony Atkins is an active member within CarolinasWPA. His vision for the organization is that it will ideally continue to grow and  support WPAs in the Carolinas, seeking to endorse the national goals and mission of the Council of Writing Program Administrators. “We seek to build community among those who teach writing from a myriad of perspectives,” says Atkins.

 

Tony’s current research interests include Technologies of Composing, Rhetorical Theory, Composition Theory, Writing Program Administration, Professional Writing, Document Design, and most recently the Rhetoric of Search Engine Optimization.

 

Beyond CarolinasWPA, Tony is currently an associate professor of English at University of North Carolina Wilmington, where he focuses on first-year writing, WPA, and the field of rhetoric and composition. Tony has also published on the effects of social media on business communications.

 

 

Carolinas WPA Highlighted on Inside Higher Ed

by Jordan Stanley

Last month, the Carolinas WPA conference was featured in an article written by Jon Warner for Inside Higher Ed. Not only is the feature on the website a testament to Carolinas WPA’s growing impact on higher education discussions, but Warner’s commentary on his own keynote address also speaks to the meaningful value of the conference.

Warner’s address was entitled Who Are We? What Do We Do? How Do We Do It?: The Laborers and Labor of the Composition Classroom.This includes the three themes he uses to encapsulate his experience at the conference. Beyond his academic takeaways, Warner’s deepest impression was that of professional uplift, provided to him through relating to the 35 other writing administrators on matters of “overworked and underpaid” contingency.

In his article, Warner describes the bounty of lessons that he drew from his peers. Warner writes that the first institutionalized problem is who writing program administrators are. As represented at the conference, many – if not a majority of – first-year writing faculty are women, and because of this, those courses are under sourced and consigned as what Warner calls “women’s work.”

These courses are further devalued, then, because what writing program administrators teach is unknown to colleagues outside of the discipline. Warner writes that although communication skills are claimed to be valued, institutions can view composition classes as a “logistical” precursor rather than an academic building block. This relegated importance consequently determines how writing program administrators work: overcompensating and self-sacrificing, despite lacking resources, to best serve their students.

Warner’s full article “Overworked and Underpaid: The Labor and Laborers of the Writing Classroom” may be read here, on the Inside Higher Ed website.

 

Jordan Stanley is a junior at Elon University with majors in Professional Writing and Rhetoric and Creative Writing, as well as a minor in Communications. She also works for the Elon Writing Center and as a Writing Fellow.

Call  for  Proposals: Defining,  Locating,  and  Addressing  Bullying  in  the  WPA  Workplace

Editors:

Dr.  Cristyn  L.  Elder,  University  of  New  Mexico

Dr.  Bethany  Davila,  University  of  New  Mexico

 

Given  the  prevalence  of  workplace  bullying  and  the  often  unique  and/or   vulnerable  position  of  WPAs  (e.g.,  untenured  WPAs;  WPAs  who  have  high campus   visibility  but  lack  the  power  to  make  hiring/firing/budget  decisions;  WPAs  in   literature  departments,  etc.),  it  is  important  to  dedicate resources  to  defining   behaviors  and  patterns  of  bullying  and  offer  specific  strategies  for  agentive   responses.  Much  of  WPA  literature  has  addressed issues  of  power  associated  with   WPA  work  (e.g.,  Dew  and  Horning;  George;  Mountford;  Pauliny;  Strickland  and   Gunner;  Schell;  White).  However, workplace  bullying  has  not  yet  received  focused   attention  in  WPA  scholarship.  In  The  Promise  and  Perils  of  Writing  Program   Administration  (2008), Skeffington,  Borrowman,  and  Enos  begin  the  collection  by   listing  the  questions  they  did  not  ask  in  “a  Web  survey  of  WPAs”  (p.  8),  including,  as   the authors  note,  the  most  important,  yet  implicit,  question—“are  you  okay?”—  a   question  to  which  “many  junior  faculty  with  administrative  duties cannot respond   positively  on  either  a  personal  or  professional  level”  (p.  9).  Despite  the   acknowledgment  of  the  challenges  WPAs  face,  including  either  being bullied  or   seeing  others  bullied,  there  has  yet  to  be  a  collection  that  focuses  on  defining,   locating,  and  addressing  bullying  in  the  WPA  workplace—including  perspectives   from  (non/un)tenured  WPAs,  WPAs  from  underrepresented  social  groups,  WPAs   for  whom  English  is  not  their  native language, and  WPAs  responding  to  the  bullying   of  others  (e.g.,  students,  staff,  faculty,  etc.).  This,  we  believe,  is  an  oversight  that   leaves  workplace  bullying largely  unnamed  and  undertheorized,  forcing  WPAs  into   the  vulnerable  position  of  having  to  seek  out  resources  and  advice  on  their  own  or   to  read between  the  lines  of  what  has  been  published.

 

 

Leah  Hollis,  Ed.D,  (2012)  estimates  the  incidence  of  workplace  bullying  in   higher  education  to  be approximately  62%  (p.  36).  In  contrast  to  the  lack of  direct   attention  it  has  received  within  WPA  scholarship,  workplace  bullying  has  been  a   topic  of increasing  importance  in  higher  education,  with articles  ranging  from   reporting  on  incidents  of  bullying  (DeFrancesco,  2015;  Wilson,  2010)  to describing   anti-­‐bullying  policies  (Flaherty,  2014).

 

 

Additionally,  according  to  other  scholarship   on  workplace  bullying,  “there  is  growing  evidence suggesting  that  minority  status   could  be  a  contributing factor  to  receiving  differential  treatment  in  the  workplace”   (Lewis,  Giga,  and  Hoel,  2010,  p. 271).  As  such,  the  issue  of  workplace  bullying  is  an   issue of  social  justice,  as  minority  and  disenfranchised  WPAs  may  be  silenced  or   excluded through  these  practices.     For  the  above  reasons,  the  editors  of this  collection  invite  chapter  proposals  for   theoretical  essays,  empirical  research, narratives,  practice-­‐oriented  papers,  book   reviews,  action  research and  reflective  essays.  Proposals  are  welcome  on  (but  not   limited  to)  the  following topics:

 

 

Definitions  of  Bullying  in  the  WPA  Workplace:  

  • What  is  workplace  bullying/harassment  in  the  WPA  workplace?  How  is  it   operationalized?
  • What  is  cyberbullying  in  the  WPA  workplace?  How  is  it  operationalized?
  • What  are  the  various  ways  bullying  is  experienced  by  teachers?   administrators?  graduate  students?  undergraduate  students?  international   students?  international  faculty?  multilingual  writers?  non-­‐traditional   students?  women?  men?  people  of  color?  members  of  the  LGBTQ   community?  others?
  • How  is  workplace  bullying/harassment  identified  and  measured?
  • What  are  the  risk  factors  for  bullying  and/or  harassment?
  • What  are  the  costs  of  bullying?

 

 

Locations  of  Bullying:  

  • How  is  bullying/harassment  experienced  or  perpetrated  by  stakeholders   within  first-­‐year  composition  programs?  writing  centers?  WAC programs?   undergraduate  programs?  graduate  programs?  departments?  committees?   professional  organizations?  on  the  job  market?  in  different cultural  settings?
  • How  does  workplace  bullying/harassment  overlap  with  working  conditions,   issues  of  a  living  wage,  health  and  safety,  discrimination?

 

 

Effectiveness  of  Bullying  Interventions  and  Programs:

  • What  are  best  practices  for  addressing  workplace  bullies?
  • What  are  best  practices  for  addressing  those  who  have  been  bullied?
  • How  do  we  cope  with/respond  to  workplace  ill-­‐treatment  of  ourselves?  of   others?
  • What  are  prevention  and  intervention  issues  related  to  bullying  and   harassment?
  • How  do  we  promote,  build,  and  maintain  healthy  workplaces  for  all?
  • How  do  we  build  bullying  prevention  into  our  WPA  preparation  programs?
  • What  environmental  and  cultural  changes  might  help  to  reduce  bullying  and   harassment?
  • What  programmatic  and/or  policy  changes  might  help  to  reduce  bullying  and   harassment?
  • How  might  we  further  advance  our  understanding  of  preventing  and   managing  workplace  bullying  and  harassment?

 

 

Proposals should be sent as an email attachment to both editors and should include a title, name(s) of author(s), and a 500-word statement of topic, argument, method, and description of chapter organization and development. Chapters will be approximately 1520 pages in length.

 

 

Prospective contributors may send proposals or queries to the editors at celder@unm.edu and bdavila@unm.edu.

 

 

Proposals due: October 26, 2015

Conditional acceptances: December 15, 2015

Manuscripts due: April 15, 2016